11. References

  1. Fonseca R, Otahal P, Wiggins N, Marwick TH. Growth and geographical variation in the use of cardiac imaging in Australia. Intern Med J. 2015;45(11):1115–27.
  2. Montalescot G, Sechtem U, Achenbach S, Andreotti F, Arden C, Budaj A, et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease - addenda. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(38):2949–3003.
  3. Shaw LJ, Mieres JH, Hendel RH, Boden WE, Gulati M, Veledar E, et al. Comparative effectiveness of exercise electrocardiography with or without myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography in women with suspected coronary artery disease: Results from the what is the optimal method for ischemia evaluation . Circulation. 2011;124(11):1239–49.
  4. Mark DB, Shaw L, Harrell FE, Hlatky MA, Lee KL, Bengtson JR, et al. Prognostic value of a treadmill exercise score in outpatients with suspected coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 1991;325(12):849–53. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1875969
  5. Newman RJ, Darrow M, Cummings DM, King V, Whetstone L, Kelly S, et al. Predictive value of exercise stress testing in a family medicine population. J Am Board Fam Med [Internet]. 2008;21(6):531–8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18988720
  6. Montalescot G, Sechtem U, Achenbach S, Andreotti F, Arden C, Budaj A, et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(38):2949–3003.
  7. Fihn SD, Gardin JM, Abrams J, Berra K, Blankenship JC, Dallas AP, et al. 2012 ACCF / AHA / ACP / AATS / PCNA / SCAI / STS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease : Executive Summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation / American Heart Association Task Forc. 2012;60(24):3097–137.
  8. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Chest pain of recent onset: assessment and diagnosis (CG95) [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2016 Oct 7]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG95
  9. Department of Health. Unpublished data, multiple extracts by date of service for services in financial years 2005-06 to 2014-15.
  10. MBS Review Taskforce. Appropriate Use Criteria. 2016.
  11. Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand. Guidelines for Training and Performance in Adult Echocardiography. 2012.
  12. Lai WW, Geva T, Shirali GS, Frommelt PC, Humes RA, Brook MM, et al. Guidelines and Standards for Performance of a Pediatric Echocardiogram: A Report from the Task Force of the Pediatric Council of the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr [Internet]. 2006 Dec;19(12):1413–30. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0894731706009369
  13. Campbell RM, Douglas PS, Eidem BW, Lai WW, Lopez L, Sachdeva R. ACC/AAP/AHA/ASE/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/SOPE 2014 appropriate Use criteria for initial transthoracic echocardiography in outpatient pediatric cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol [Internet]. 2014;64(19):2039–60. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.08.003
  14. Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand. Guidelines for standards of practice in Paediatric Echocardiography [Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://www.csanz.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Paeds_Echo-Standards_of_Practice.pdf
  15. Albers AR, Krichavsky MZ, Balady GJ. Stress testing in patients with diabetes mellitus diagnostic and prognostic value. Circulation. 2006;113(4):583–92.
  16. Harris GD, White RD. Exercise Stress Testing in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: When Are Asymptomatic Patients Screened? Clin Diabetes [Internet]. 2007;25(4):126–30. Available from: http://clinical.diabetesjournals.org/content/25/4/126
  17. Sekhri N, Feder GS, Junghans C, Eldridge S, Umaipalan A, Madhu R, et al. Incremental prognostic value of the exercise electrocardiogram in the initial assessment of patients with suspected angina: cohort study. Br Med J. 2008;337:a2240.
  18. Peteiro J, Bouzas-Mosquera A, Broullon J, Sanchez-Fernandez G, Perez-Cebey L, Yañez J, et al. Outcome by Exercise Echocardiography in Patients with Low Pretest Probability of Coronary Artery Disease. J Am Soc Echocardiogr [Internet]. 2016 Aug;29(8):736–44. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0894731716001681
  19. Bouzas-Mosquera A, Peteiro J, Broullón FJ, Méndez E, Barge-Caballero G, López-Pérez M, et al. Impact of electrocardiographic interpretability on outcome in patients referred for stress testing. Eur J Clin Invest [Internet]. 2012 May;42(5):541–7. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1365-2362.2011.02615.x
  20. Myers J, Prakash M, Froelicher V, Do D, Partington S, Atwood JE. Exercise capacity and mortality among men referred for exercise testing. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2002 Mar 14;346(11):793–801. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11893790
  21. Douglas PS, Khandheria B, Stainback RF, Weissman NJ. ACCF/ASE/ACEP/AHA/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR 2008 Appropriateness Criteria for Stress Echocardiography J Am Coll Cardiol [Internet]. 2008 Mar;51(11):1127–47. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0735109707039629
  22. Williams MC, Hunter A, Shah AS V, Assi V, Lewis S, Smith J, et al. Use of Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography to Guide Management of Patients with Coronary Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(15):1759–68.
  23. Sheffield KM, McAdams PS, Benarroch-Gampel J, Goodwin JS, Boyd CA, Zhang D, et al. Overuse of Preoperative Cardiac Stress Testing in Medicare Patients Undergoing Elective Noncardiac Surgery. Ann Surg [Internet]. 2013 Jan;257(1):73–80. Available from: http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00000658-201301000-00011
  24. Gertz ZM, O’Donnell W, Raina A, Litwack AJ, Balderston JR, Goldberg LR. Application of appropriate use criteria to cardiac stress testing in the hospital setting: Limitations of the criteria and areas for improved practice. Clin Cardiol. 2015;38(1):8–12.
  25. Kristensen SD, Knuuti J. New ESC/ESA Guidelines on non-cardiac surgery: Cardiovascular assessment and management. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(35):2344–5.
  26. Douglas PS, Garcia MJ, Haines DE, Lai WW, Manning WJ, Patel AR, et al. ACCF/ASE/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR 2011 Appropriate Use Criteria for Echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol [Internet]. 2011;57(9):1126–66. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.11.002
  27. Lee JC, West MJ, Khafagi FA. Reply to letter to the editor regarding myocardial perfusion scans. 2013;42(12):841. Available from: http://www.racgp.org.au/download/Documents/AFP/2013/December/201312letters.pdf
  28. Einstein AJ. Effects of Radiation Exposure From Cardiac Imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol [Internet]. 2012 Feb;59(6):553–65. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0735109711049217
  29. Sabarudin A, Sun Z. Coronary CT angiography: Dose reduction strategies. World J Cardiol [Internet]. 2013 Dec 26;5(12):465–72. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24392191
  30. Fazel R, Gerber TC, Balter S, Brenner DJ, Carr JJ, Cerqueira MD, et al. Approaches to enhancing radiation safety in cardiovascular imaging: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation [Internet]. 2014 Nov 4;130(19):1730–48. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25366837
  31. Husain SS. Myocardial perfusion imaging protocols: is there an ideal protocol? J Nucl Med Technol [Internet]. 2007;35:3–9. Available from: http://interactive.snm.org/docs/jnmt37911.pdf
  32. Danad I, Szymonifka J, Twisk JWR, Norgaard BL, Zarins CK, Knaapen P, et al. Diagnostic performance of cardiac imaging methods to diagnose ischaemia-causing coronary artery disease when directly compared with fractional flow reserve as a reference standard: a meta-analysis. Eur Heart J [Internet]. 2016 May 2; Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27141095
  33. Metz LD, Beattie M, Hom R, Redberg RF, Grady D, Fleischmann KE. The prognostic value of normal exercise myocardial perfusion imaging and exercise echocardiography: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol [Internet]. 2007 Jan 16;49(2):227–37. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17222734
  34. Heijenbrok-Kal MH, Fleischmann KE, Hunink MGM. Stress echocardiography, stress single-photon-emission computed tomography and electron beam computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of diagnostic performance. Am Heart J [Internet]. 2007 Sep;154(3):415–23. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17719283
  35. Holmes DR, Taggart DP. Revascularization in stable coronary artery disease: A combined perspective from an interventional cardiologist and a cardiac surgeon. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(24):1873–82.
  36. OECD Indicators. Health at a Glance 2009 [Internet]. OECD Publishing; 2009. (Health at a Glance). Available from: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/health-at-a-glance-2009_health_glance-2009-en
  37. Baig SS, Altman DG, Taggart DP. Major geographical variations in elective coronary revascularization by stents or surgery in England. Eur J Cardio-thoracic Surg. 2015;47(5):855–9.
  38. Tu J V, Ko DT, Guo H, Richards JA, Walton N, Natarajan MK, et al. Determinants of variations in revascularization practices. Can Med Assoc J [Internet]. 2012 Feb 7;184(2):179–86. Available from: http://www.cmaj.ca/cgi/doi/10.1503/cmaj.111946
  39. Hannan EL, Racz MJ, Gold J, Cozzens K, Stamato NJ, Powell T, et al. Adherence of catheterization laboratory cardiologists to American college of cardiology/American heart association guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions and coronary artery bypass graft surgery: What happens in actual practice? Circulation. 2010;121(2):267–75.
  40. Hanna EL, Samadashvili Z, Cozzens K, Walford G, Holmes DR, Jacobs AK, et al. Appropriateness of diagnostic catheterization for suspected coronary artery disease in New York State. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7(1):19–27.
  41. Chandrasekharan DP, Taggart DP. Informed consent for interventions in stable coronary artery disease: Problems, etiologies, and solutions. Eur J Cardio-thoracic Surg [Internet]. 2011;39(6):912–7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.08.033
  42. Kipp R, Lehman J, Israel J, Edwards N, Becker T, Raval A. Patient preferences for coronary artery bypass graft surgery or percutaneous intervention in multivessel coronary artery disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv [Internet]. 2013;82(2):212–8. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ccd.24399/full
  43. Health Consult - Endorsed by the PCI Review Working Group. PCI Review Report [Internet]. 2016. Available from: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/ReviewsCMFM
  44. Patel MR, Bailey SR, Bonow RO, Chambers CE, Chan PS, Dehmer GJ, et al. ACCF/SCAI/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2012 appropriate use criteria for diagnostic catheterization: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and. J Am Coll Cardiol [Internet]. 2012;59(22):1995–2027. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.03.003
  45. Lefkovits J, Brennan AL, Dinh D, Brien R, Driscoll A, Reid CM. The Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry Annual Report 2015. 2016;74. Available from: http://www.vcor.org.au/sites/default/files/VCOR_files/2015_vcor_annual_report.pdf
  46. The European Society of Cardiology. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J [Internet]. 2014 Oct 1;35(37):2541–619. Available from: http://eurheartj.oxfordjournals.org/lookup/doi/10.1093/eurheartj/ehu278
  47. Chew DP, Scott IA, Cullen L, French JK, Briffa TG, Tideman PA, et al. National Heart Foundation of Australia & Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand: Australian Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes 2016. Hear Lung Circ [Internet]. 2016 Sep;25(9):895–951. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1443950616310617
  48. Zhang Z, Kolm P, Boden WE, Hartigan PM, Maron DJ, Spertus JA, et al. The cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention as a function of angina severity in patients with stable angina. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011;4(2):172–82.
  49. Weintraub WS, Boden WE, Zhang Z, Kolm P, Zhang Z, Spertus JA, et al. Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention in optimally treated stable coronary patients. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2008;1(1):12–20.
  50. Gada H, Whitlow PL, Marwick TH. Establishing the cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion in stable angina: a decision-analytic model. Heart [Internet]. 2012 Dec 15;98(24):1790–7. Available from: http://heart.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302581
  51. Wijeysundera HC, Tomlinson G, Ko DT, Dzavik V, Krahn MD. Medical Therapy v. PCI in Stable Coronary Artery Disease: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Med Decis Mak [Internet]. 2013 Oct 1;33(7):891–905. Available from: http://mdm.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0272989X13497262
  52. Rybicki FJ, Udelson JE, Peacock WF, Goldhaber SZ, Isselbacher EM, et al. 2015 ACR/ACC/AHA/AATS/ACEP/ASNC/NASCI/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR/SCPC/SNMMI/STR/STS Appropriate Utilization of Cardiovascular Imaging in Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain. J Am Coll Cardiol [Internet]. 2016 Feb;67(7):853–79. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0735109715061495
  53. Shreibati JB, Baker LC, Hlatky MA. Association of Coronary CT Angiography or Stress Testing With Subsequent Utilization and Spending Among Medicare Beneficiaries. JAMA [Internet]. 2011 Nov 16;306(19). Available from: http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/jama.2011.1652
  54. Douglas PS, Hoffmann U, Patel MR, Mark DB, Al-Khalidi HR, Cavanaugh B, et al. Outcomes of Anatomical versus Functional Testing for Coronary Artery Disease. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2015 Apr 2;372(14):1291–300. Available from: http://www.nejm.org/doi/abs/10.1056/NEJMoa1415516
  55. The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. Standards for general practices (4th edition) [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2016 Oct 12]. Available from: http://www.racgp.org.au/your-practice/standards/standards4thedition/physical-factors/5-2/practice-equipment/
  56. Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Cardiology: five things physicians and patients should question [Internet]. Choosing Wisely Canada. [cited 2016 May 14]. Available from: www.choosingwiselycanada.org/recommendations/cardiology/
  57. Canadian Society of Internal Medicine. Five things physicians and patients should question [Internet]. Choosing Wisely Canada. [cited 2016 May 14]. Available from: www.choosingwiselycanada.org/recommendations/internal-medicine/
  58. Fleisher LA, Fleischmann KE, Auerbach AD, Barnason SA, Beckman JA, Bozkurt B, et al. 2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: A report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(22):e77–137.
  59. Darwin L, Chung F. Patient selection for day surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care Med [Internet]. 2013;14(3):114–8. Available from: http://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L368554796\nhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mpaic.2013.01.003
  60. van Klei WA, Bryson GL, Yang H, Kalkman CJ, Wells GA, Beattie WS. The value of routine preoperative electrocardiography in predicting myocardial infarction after noncardiac surgery. Ann Surg [Internet]. 2007;246(2):165–70. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1933558&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
  61. Health Consult - Endorsed by the AECG Review Working Group. Ambulatory Electrocardiography Review Report [Internet]. 2016. Available from: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/ReviewsCMFM
  62. The Task Force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of The European Society of Cardiology. 2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J [Internet]. 2013 Aug 1;34(29):2281–329. Available from: http://eurheartj.oxfordjournals.org/lookup/doi/10.1093/eurheartj/eht150
  63. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, Bueno H, Cleland JGF, Coats AJS, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J [Internet]. 2016 Jul 14;37(27):2129–200. Available from: http://eurheartj.oxfordjournals.org/lookup/doi/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw128
  64. Maron BJ. Sudden Cardiac Death in Genetic Heart Diseases and the Promise of Prevention. Rev Española Cardiol (English Ed [Internet]. 2010 Mar;63(3):257–60. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1885585710700566
  65. Priori SG, Blomström-Lundqvist C, Mazzanti A, Blom N, Borggrefe M, Camm J, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: The Task Force for the Management of Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death of the Europe. Eur Heart J [Internet]. 2015;36(41):2793–867. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16935866
  66. Wilkoff BL, Love CJ, Byrd CL, Bongiorni MG, Carrillo RG, Crossley GH, et al. Transvenous Lead Extraction: Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus on Facilities, Training, Indications, and Patient Management. This document was endorsed by the American Heart Association (AHA). Hear Rhythm [Internet]. 2009;6(7):1085–104. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.05.020
  67. CSANZ. Statement of the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand regarding the Extraction of Implanted Cardiac Device Leads , in particular the provision of surgical support. 2014.
  68. State Coroner’s Court of New South Wales. Coronial Inquest into the death of Toni Ann Peadon. Glebe, NSW; 2014.
  69. Yi G, Shine B, Rehman SM, Altman DG, Taggart DP. Effect of bilateral internal mammary artery grafts on long-term survival: A meta-analysis approach. Circulation. 2014;130(7):539–45.
  70. Taggart DP, D’Amico R, Altman DG. Effect of arterial revascularisation on survival: a systematic review of studies comparing bilateral and single internal mammary arteries. Lancet [Internet]. 2001 Sep;358(9285):870–5. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S014067360106069X
  71. Weiss AJ, Zhao S, Tian DH, Taggart DP, Yan TD. A meta-analysis comparing bilateral internal mammary artery with left internal mammary artery for coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Cardiothorac Surg [Internet]. 2013 Jul;2(4):390–400. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23977614
  72. Buxton BF, Hayward PA. The art of arterial revascularization-total arterial revascularization in patients with triple vessel coronary artery disease. Ann Cardiothorac Surg [Internet]. 2013 Jul;2(4):543–51. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23977634
  73. Vallely MP, Yan TD, Edelman JJB, Hayman M, Brereton RJL, Ross DE. Anaortic, total-arterial, off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: how to do it. Heart Lung Circ [Internet]. 2010 Sep;19(9):555–60. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20447865
  74. Misfeld M, Potger K, Ross DE, McMillan D, Brady PW, Marshman D, et al. “Anaortic” off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting significantly reduces neurological complications compared to off-pump and conventional on-pump surgery with aortic manipulation. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;58(7):408–14.
  75. Moss E, Puskas JD, Thourani VH, Kilgo P, Chen EP, Leshnower BG, et al. Avoiding aortic clamping during coronary artery bypass grafting reduces postoperative stroke. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg [Internet]. 2015;149(1):175–80. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.09.011
  76. Patel NC, Deodhar AP, Grayson AD, Pullan DM, Keenan DJM, Hasan R, et al. Neurological outcomes in coronary surgery: Independent effect of avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74(2):400–6.
  77. Calafiore AM, Di Mauro M, Teodori G, Di Giammarco G, Cirmeni S, Contini M, et al. Impact of aortic manipulation on incidence of cerebrovascular accidents after surgical myocardial revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73(5):1387–93.
  78. Emmert MY, Seifert B, Wilhelm M, Grünenfelder J, Falk V, Salzberg SP. Aortic no-touch technique makes the difference in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg [Internet]. 2011;142(6):1499–506. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21683376
  79. Kapetanakis EI, Stamou SC, Dullum MKC, Hill PC, Haile E, Boyce SW, et al. The impact of aortic manipulation on neurologic outcomes after coronary artery bypass surgery: A risk-adjusted study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78(5):1564–71.
  80. Krasuski R a, Hart S a, Allen D, Qureshi A, Pettersson G, Houghtaling PL, et al. Prevalence and repair of intraoperatively diagnosed patent foramen ovale and association with perioperative outcomes and long-term survival. JAMA. 2009;302(3):290–7.
  81. Stiles S. “Drive-by” PFO Closure at Non-PFO Cardiac Surgery May up Stroke Risk. Medscape [Internet]. 2009;(Jul 15). Available from: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/705966_print
|

_________________________________________